- Report this article
Cameron Hight
Cameron Hight
CEO & Founder | Helping Investment Managers Optimize Their Position Sizing Process
Published Jan 2, 2024
+ Follow
I have some “go-to” thought experiments I pull out when speaking to portfolio managers and analysts. One is from the “Success Equation” by Michael Mauboussin where he asks the question, “Could you purposefully lose money investing in stocks?” (Read more about our Book Club with Mauboussin here).
Mauboussin suggests that stock investing is more akin to a game of luck, like roulette or craps, rather than a game of skill, like chess or basketball. This analogy raises an important question: Is investing more skill or luck?
The average batting average for long positions (percentage of investments that go up more than the market) of Alpha Theory managers over the past 11 years is 51%. This is better than random, but not by much. Said another way, you could possibly lose on purpose in aggregate, but you couldn’t on any individual bet.
Interestingly, there is a place where we can find more skill. If we look at all the long positions with forecasted positive returns, the batting average soars to 58%. This basically means eliminating all of the positions where the manager didn’t take the time to come up with price targets or where the expected return forecast has turned negative.
The data suggests there is real forecasting skill. This means that investing is not luck, like roulette. But it is not like chess either. It is a profession with a large dose of skill and luck, like poker.
In poker, the high-skilled player will almost certainly beat the low-skilled player if playing 1000s of hands. If playing 10s of hands, the low-skilled player can beat the high-skilled player. By contrast, the high-skilled chess player will win almost every game (if not every game).
What does this mean to you as an investor? Let your skill manifest itself by building an environment where you can be like the high-skilled poker player who gets to play 100s or 1000s of hands (investments) over a long period of time. Protect downside. Isolate skill by neutralizing non-skill factors (market and factor exposures). Try and find LPs that will stick with you long enough to let your skill overcome luck. And, if you can, get a little lucky. 😊
Help improve contributions
Mark contributions as unhelpful if you find them irrelevant or not valuable to the article. This feedback is private to you and won’t be shared publicly.
Contribution hidden for you
This feedback is never shared publicly, we’ll use it to show better contributions to everyone.
Like
Celebrate
Support
Love
Insightful
Funny
28
2 Comments
Jason Wilburn
Enterprise Sales Director @ Quickbase | Driving Growth with Strategic Partnerships
2mo
- Report this comment
It depends. Are you investing (skill) in great companies or playing the (luck) short game. The market will do what it’s always done. Grow
1Reaction
Stan Altshuller
Co-Founder @ Goodbrand | Content Marketing, Investment Management, FinTech, Data
3mo
- Report this comment
I’ve always loved that analogy from Michael. We leaned on it a lot at Novus. His other analogy is great in a portfolio context too - a high scoring game (basketball) vs a low scoring game (hockey) is akin to a concentrated vs diversified portfolio. As luck can affect any one outcome, more “at bats” will tend toward skill driven and fewer at bats will be more luck driven
1Reaction
See more comments
To view or add a comment, sign in
More articles by this author
No more previous content
- Mauboussin: The Two Decision Aids that Fundamental Investors Should Use…But Often Don’t Mar 27, 2024
- How Human Intuition Improves by Using Optimizers: Learnings from DE Shaw Feb 28, 2024
- Alpha Theory 2023 Year in Review Jan 29, 2024
- Alpha Theory Stock Selection Index Nov 30, 2023
- Portfolio Intuition by Chris Kennedy Oct 31, 2023
- Alpha Theory 2022 Year in Review: The Year That Broke the Streak Sep 28, 2023
- Diversity Orthogonality Theory: The Key Ingredient to a Free Lunch Aug 30, 2023
- Mauboussin Gives Us Confidence Jul 27, 2023
- I Am No Expert Jun 29, 2023
- Batting and Slugging Sensitivity May 25, 2023
No more next content
Sign in
Stay updated on your professional world
Sign in
By clicking Continue, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
Insights from the community
- Financial Management What psychological biases can affect your investing decisions?
- Economics What economic decisions do you make based on opportunity cost?
- Decision-Making What is the opportunity cost of your decisions?
- Operations Research How do you manage conflicting objectives in game theory?
- Private Equity You’re thinking of exiting an investment. What should you be considering?
- Private Equity You’re thinking of exiting an investment. What should you be considering?
- Economics You need to make a major investment decision. How can you be sure you’re making the right choice?
- Economics How can you use economic psychology to reduce cognitive biases in investment decisions?
- Economics How can the Sharpe ratio help you make better investment decisions?
- Small Business How do you tell customers and stakeholders about your diversification goals?
Others also viewed
- SIMPLICITY IS THE NAME OF THE GAME Vivek Mulay 3y
- The Loss Aversion Bias : Yogita Dand 3y
- What You Have to Say “YES” to Jason Brown 5y
- Take Emotions out of Investing Paula Swick 3y
- From Poor to Rich - Why Investing is Always Possible U. Mahesh Prabhu 11mo
- Take emotions out of investing samaneh mozayani 3y
- Do You Have a “5-Tool” Portfolio? Rob Isbitts 5y
- If what you thought to be true, and knew to be true, wasn’t – when would you want to know? Revae Stuart 2y
- Who gets a higher return- a trader or an investor? Alex Jamieson 8y
- Poker + business + applied lessons from Nassim Taleb Yishi Zuo 4y
Explore topics
- Sales
- Marketing
- Business Administration
- HR Management
- Content Management
- Engineering
- Soft Skills
- See All